<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portfoliage &#187; tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://portfoliage.com/category/tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://portfoliage.com</link>
	<description>The photography portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Post Processing with the D3 and the D700</title>
		<link>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/16/post-processing-with-the-d3-and-the-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/16/post-processing-with-the-d3-and-the-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thyrymn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfoliage.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never mentioned this, but there is a D3 in my family.  My brother-in-law shoots with one.  I&#8217;ve also got a D2X and a D70 around that he owns.  My basic post processing flow hasn&#8217;t changed because of the Nikon upgrades.  So check out <a title="http://portfoliage.com/?page_id=96" href="http://" target="_self">this page</a> to learn about my post processing process which is basically the same for the D70 -&gt; D200 -&gt; D2X -&gt; D700 and -&gt; D3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/16/post-processing-with-the-d3-and-the-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>d700 not sharp?</title>
		<link>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/05/d700-not-sharp/</link>
		<comments>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/05/d700-not-sharp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thyrymn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfoliage.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard rumours that alot of people are running into problems with the d700 not being as sharp as they would expect.  I&#8217;m not too sure about that problem.  And let me tell you why.
Everytime I&#8217;ve upgraded to a more &#8216;pro&#8217; type equipment I&#8217;ve had to spend a month or so adjusting my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumours that alot of people are running into problems with the d700 not being as sharp as they would expect.  I&#8217;m not too sure about that problem.  And let me tell you why.</p>
<p>Everytime I&#8217;ve upgraded to a more &#8216;pro&#8217; type equipment I&#8217;ve had to spend a month or so adjusting my technique.  I found that the more pro end, the less forgivable the equipment was with my sloppy technique.  It happened when I went from the d70 to the d200.  It happened when I went from a 70-300 5.6 lens to the 70-200 2.8 (and a 1.7tc).  I happened again with the d200 to the d700.  So every time I upgrade I end up spending some time upgrading my technique too.</p>
<p>That being said, if your d700 isn&#8217;t as sharp as you expect there are a couple things you can do.</p>
<p>1.  Take it back (my first d200 had a rear focusing problem)<br />
2.  Reset it.  The submenu for fine tuning to a specific lens might be screwing up your sharpness.<br />
3.  Ensure adequate shutterspeed by controlling aperture and ISO  before you decide to take it back.<br />
4.  Test in controlled conditions.</p>
<p>I personally do not find my d700 less or more sharp than the d200.  It is less forgiving of my mistakes though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portfoliage.com/2008/10/05/d700-not-sharp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D700</title>
		<link>http://portfoliage.com/2008/08/29/d700/</link>
		<comments>http://portfoliage.com/2008/08/29/d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thyrymn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portfoliage.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sold the d200 and got a d700.  Check out my experimentation blog page here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sold the d200 and got a d700.  Check out my experimentation blog page <a title="D700 Review" href="http://portfoliage.com/?page_id=48" target="_self">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://portfoliage.com/2008/08/29/d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
